This is the first of a weekly series of posts on various aspects of social software design I find interestinghere is the full list. Each of these posts are written over the course of a few hours in a straight shot. Contents may be mildly idiosyncratic. To vote on what I should write about next, go to this Quora question.

The original impetus for this came from an impromptu Caltrain ride with Ben Newman, an engineer at Quora. During that ride, we had an interesting conversation about Quora’s particular attitudes towards humor (they’re pretty dour) and why that was the case. As it turns out, the Quora staff had thought pretty carefully about the nature of humor and its effects on communities and their operational procedures reflect a certain set of beliefs they hold. I’m not going to attempt to speak for Quora based on a 20 minute conversation a few weeks ago but some of their thinking did remind me of some of the stuff I had also been thinking about with regard to humor on the web.

The Internet has a citizenry. Like how some people self identify has African-American or Asian-American, there is a subset of the population for which it would be most accurate to label them Internet-American. Not everyone who has ever been on the Internet is part of this group. Most people are merely tourists or commuters, they come in, they visit a while but, at the end of the day, they go home to their real lives. For the Internet-Americans, the Internet is, at least in part, their real lives and meatspace existence is the culturally foreign experience.

Like the founding of any new migrant nation, the citizenry of the Internet is a motley crew. Some were lured by the promise of virgin lands, yet to be explored, others by the promise of a new identity. But like any new settlement, by far the most dominant were the people who arrived to escape the oppression of their homeland. They were the ones who felt under appreciated, misunderstood, ignored or abused by their real world peers and found refuge among their kin online. Together, they built an alternate culture, one that was a deliberate snub against those who had rejected them. It is from these foundations that a particular strain of Internet culture was born and the effects of this evolution are still felt online today.

To fully explore the extent of this would be it’s own, separate, mammoth task. For this post, I’m solely going to look at the ramifications of such an evolution in the context of humor and how it has become operationalized in a way that may seem unfamiliar to those who are not citizens of the Internet.

In real life, almost all of our opportunities to deploy humor are with people who we already know or would like to know better. While we use humor for many purposes, we crucially care about the reaction from the other person. For the most part, humor is deployed to give other people pleasure.

On the web, the affordances of the interaction are different. Most of our online interactions are with people we do not know and cannot fully empathize with. Humor shifts from less of a bonding activity and into more of a performative one. This is not entirely without precedent in our offline worlds. If you listen to interviews by prominent comics about their childhood, often they turned to humor as a defense mechanism. It was a way they discovered to deflect harm or attract attention. Humor was a way for comics to validate their worth and prove to themselves their superiority. To understand humor on the web, you have to look at it from this perspective.

By far the largest majority of humor on the web comprises of memes, catchphrases, remixes and repetition. All your base are belong to us, lolcatz, goatse and the rest. Some of them are funny. With the enormous profusion that is characteristic of the Internet, it would be impossible for some of them not to be funny. But, by far, the majority are not. They are tired, cliched rehashes of beaten to death jokes. Why then, do they persist? Because their goal never was to be funny, your amusement is never the prime concern. Instead, they exist as a credential of citizenship. It is a communication from the poster that he belongs to some in-group for which a set of memes form the common language and the humor is both simultaneously inclusionary of those who get the reference and exclusionary to those who do not. It’s of no coincidence that Family Guy is a show particularly beloved by the Internet citizenry, given that a full half the jokes on there comprise of mere recognition of some obscure, pop cultural phenomena.

The next largest contingent of internet humor comprises of pedanticism. Ask a serious question on the internet and there is some slight chance you may get a serious answer but you can almost always be guaranteed a series of stupid answers which answer the letter of the question while avoiding the spirit. Again, regardless of whether the answer was serious or subversive, the purpose was almost never to be helpful, by as a validation of cleverness. To answer seriously provides your bona-fides as an expert who is able to intelligently comment on a domain but to provide a joke answer is much easier to accomplish and gives you a platform to demonstrate your wit. This, as far as I can gather, is why Quora is so ruthless about extirpating parody answers. For any given question, a few people might have the requisite domain expertise to give a serious answer but almost anybody can provide a parody and, while a few might be genuinely funny, most will be a lazy attempt at recognition which contributes nothing but a sense of smug self-satisfaction for the poster.

Thus far, I have delved into two particular types of Internet humor but the same general principle applies to almost everything else the Internet citizenry writes, both online and off. Humor serves in a pure operational context, to prove worth, intelligence, belonging or superiority. It is not there to please, delight or amuse (except insofar as these further an operational goal) because it is rare that you could care enough to want to do so.

I want to note again at this point that this is not a description of all humor present everywhere on the Internet, just that deployed by the particular segment of the population which I term the Internet citizens. It has been interesting over the years, as the number of tourists on the web has started to overwhelm the citizenry, how the different cultures have merged and adapted. In a way, it mirrors the integration of African-American culture into the mainstream starting from the 60’s and continuing on into today. Most web literate people are familiar with the lingo and conventions of the Internet citizenry now and some of it has shifted into the mainstream so much that the origins have become murky. At the same time, entire communities are forming which do not derive from the legacy of Internet culture and want nothing to do with it. They are finding, much to their surprise that the virgin lands they thought they were inhabiting actually have injuns on them and that they’re none too happy for the intrusion.

I think it’s essentially for anyone trying to deploy an online community right now to be aware of the various factions and interest groups that occupy the web and how they can be both an asset and liability to your efforts. The last 10 years has been littered with the corpses of various naive corporate community building attempts who inadvertently blundered head on into these swamps like the Chevy Tahoe “Make your own ad” campaign, the Time 100 4chan stunt or Mr Splashypants among hundreds of others. I hope this impromptu ethnographic sketch provides some degree of insight into how to properly navigate the Internet and effectively deal with the natives.

To be notified of the next Social Software Sunday piece as it’s posted, you can subscribe to the RSS feed, follow me on twitter or subscribe via email:


  1. Anonymous says:

    October 4th, 2010 at 11:02 pm (#)

    This was an extremely interesting article. I have found the growth of the meme in internet culture to be a fascinating thing. I can remember when “caturday” was just beginning and sure, it was okay at first. Now the cheezburger website has expanded in such a way that almost makes me ill.

    Regardless, boredom in and of itself is what typically causes most of the hits to these sites. (I like to think so anyway.) We need a new brand of humor — I say bring on the smart and funny rather than cater to the meme-loving generation of the now.

    Thanks for the well thought out article.

  2. pjdavis says:

    October 5th, 2010 at 3:48 am (#)

  3. Nigger says:

    October 5th, 2010 at 3:57 am (#)

    I think it’s nigger faggot.

  4. Information Overload 2010-10-09 « says:

    October 10th, 2010 at 9:33 am (#)

    […] Humor on the web & how to stop itI iz in your memes, explaining dem. Oh, damn. […]

  5. Quora says:

    January 9th, 2011 at 2:35 am (#)

    Are emoticons unprofessional? When are they appropriate in work exchanges?…

    I would not go so far as to say unprofessional, I would say they informal – probably too informal for say a press release or SEC filing. Where are they useful ? They are labels that supply meta-data about a sentence or paragraph – is it intended seriou…

  6. Quora, l’humour et les références potaches | Deux croissants says:

    January 10th, 2011 at 7:17 pm (#)

    […] billet est une traduction depuis l’anglais de l’analyse que Xianhang Zhang a fait du rôle de l’humour sur Quora. Toutes les intuitions sont les siennes […]

  7. Accountants London says:

    September 21st, 2011 at 1:05 pm (#)

    i truthfully enjoy your own writing kind, very remarkable,
    don’t give up as well as keep writing due to the fact that it simply just worth to follow it. looking forward to see a whole lot more of your current well written articles, enjoy your day
    Accountants in Leeds

  8. Talha Awan says:

    February 13th, 2012 at 5:20 am (#)

    The live example of that we can easily seed on the comments made to videos on youtube. Most of them are funny and can be categorized into two kinds just like you said above. Interesting read.
    chicago personal trainer

  9. Bangalore website design says:

    February 16th, 2012 at 4:57 am (#)

    This is interesting and nice to know about the article.
    Bangalore website design

  10. ecommerce development says:

    March 26th, 2012 at 12:07 pm (#)

    THis is humor at its best.Awesome article,just made my day in the end.Thanks for sharing this article.

  11. Anonymous says:

    April 8th, 2012 at 12:04 pm (#)

    Thanks for giving me an amazing post, its great time to read your post. I’ve got some more interesting topic for discussion. So keep it updell 6400 battery

  12. Quora says:

    July 15th, 2012 at 8:24 am (#)

    Why have Hacker News and Stack Exchange succeeded where Digg failed?…

    Digg was meant to be a sharing site centered around technical question (a modern SlashDot) but, as pointed out by Soroosh, it didn’t remain true to that, and most people would compare it to the more generalist reddit, rather than Hacker News or Stack E…

  13. Quora says:

    July 15th, 2012 at 1:42 pm (#)

    Why don’t some people upvote anonymous answers?…

    That answer is now voted on top, far above the second one. I actually like the second one much better, and I think the anonymous one is lame—and probably not written by a British person, which is why it should not be on top. Making it anonymous prevent…

  14. Gay marriage has reached a turning point in American culture. | says:

    June 14th, 2013 at 6:10 am (#)

    […] Social Software Sundays #1 – Humor on the web & how to stop it … […]

Leave a Response