Comments on: Rails without Rails http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/rails-without-rails/ Official company blog for Bumblebee Labs Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:18:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: cheap uggs outlet http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/rails-without-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-9626 cheap uggs outlet Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:14:00 +0000 http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/?p=501#comment-9626 Thanks for your opinion. <a href="http://www.cheapuggsoutletau.com/" title="cheap uggs " rel="nofollow">cheap uggs</a> I totally like with it.I like <a href="http://www.cheapuggsoutletau.com/" title="cheap uggs outlet" rel="nofollow">cheap ugg outlet</a> as well and someone is looking for <a href="http://www.cheapuggsoutletau.com/" title="ugg boots outlet" rel="nofollow">ugg boots outlet</a> People usually prefer <a href="http://www.cheapuggsoutletau.com/" title="ugg boots sale" rel="nofollow">ugg boots sale</a> Thanks for your opinion. cheap uggs I totally like with it.I like cheap ugg outlet as well and someone is looking for ugg boots outlet People usually prefer ugg boots sale

]]> By: Hang http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/rails-without-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-1100 Hang Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:04:39 +0000 http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/?p=501#comment-1100 Ted, that's a good point, I'll check out data mapper. Ted, that’s a good point, I’ll check out data mapper.

]]> By: Hang http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/rails-without-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-9114 Hang Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:04:00 +0000 http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/?p=501#comment-9114 Ted, that's a good point, I'll check out data mapper. Ted, that’s a good point, I’ll check out data mapper.

]]> By: Ted Han http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/rails-without-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-1099 Ted Han Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:29:49 +0000 http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/?p=501#comment-1099 Why aren't you using DataMapper? It's specifically designed to be stand alone, and covers all of the things that you've listed there. I've used DM for several strictly data related tasks that range from mocking up new app model structures, or to provide access to existing databases, and a lot more. And there aren't any dependencies on a web application framework :) The syntax is negligibly different, and if you can get over the few best practice type things that DataMapperers dissuade (like STI, which they finally have relented on) then DM will do you fine. Why aren’t you using DataMapper?

It’s specifically designed to be stand alone, and covers all of the things that you’ve listed there.

I’ve used DM for several strictly data related tasks that range from mocking up new app model structures, or to provide access to existing databases, and a lot more.

And there aren’t any dependencies on a web application framework :)

The syntax is negligibly different, and if you can get over the few best practice type things that DataMapperers dissuade (like STI, which they finally have relented on) then DM will do you fine.

]]> By: Ted Han http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/rails-without-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-9113 Ted Han Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:29:00 +0000 http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/?p=501#comment-9113 Why aren't you using DataMapper? It's specifically designed to be stand alone, and covers all of the things that you've listed there. I've used DM for several strictly data related tasks that range from mocking up new app model structures, or to provide access to existing databases, and a lot more. And there aren't any dependencies on a web application framework :) The syntax is negligibly different, and if you can get over the few best practice type things that DataMapperers dissuade (like STI, which they finally have relented on) then DM will do you fine. Why aren’t you using DataMapper?

It’s specifically designed to be stand alone, and covers all of the things that you’ve listed there.

I’ve used DM for several strictly data related tasks that range from mocking up new app model structures, or to provide access to existing databases, and a lot more.

And there aren’t any dependencies on a web application framework :)

The syntax is negligibly different, and if you can get over the few best practice type things that DataMapperers dissuade (like STI, which they finally have relented on) then DM will do you fine.

]]>